Plato's tripartite soul: reason, spirit and appetite

In Republic Book IV, Plato divides the soul into three parts. It is one of the oldest three-part models of the mind, and it only partly matches thinking, feeling and willing.

40 questions, about 15 minutes. No account. Your answers stay in your browser.

The three parts

The parts of the soul in Republic IV
PartGreekWhat it does
ReasonlogistikonCalculates and reasons; the part that loves learning
SpiritthumoeidesAnger, indignation and the love of honor; in a healthy soul, the ally of reason
AppetiteepithumetikonDesires for food, drink, sex and money

Plato argues for the division in Republic 436a–441c (overview). His key step is that one thing cannot do opposite things in the same respect at the same time, so when a thirsty person refuses to drink, something in them is pulling against the thirst.

The story of Leontius

Plato's best-known example (439e–440a) is Leontius, who wanted to look at the bodies of executed criminals, was disgusted with himself for wanting to, and finally gave in while angrily rebuking his own eyes. The anger, Plato says, shows a spirited part siding with reason against appetite.

Does it match thinking, feeling and willing?

Mapping
PlatoClosest ICA facultyHow close
ReasonThinkingA clean match
SpiritWillingPartial: spirit is about honor and anger more than action
AppetiteFeelingWeak: emotions in Plato are spread across the parts

A common mistake lists Plato's parts as "logos, pathos and thymos". Logos, pathos and ethos are Aristotle's three means of persuasion in rhetoric, not parts of the mind.

The scheme the ICA actually descends from is the 18th-century trilogy of mind and Steiner's thinking, feeling and willing.

Common questions

What are the three parts of the soul according to Plato?

Reason (logistikon), spirit (thumoeides) and appetite (epithumetikon), set out in Republic Book IV.

Is Plato's spirit the same as the will?

Not exactly. Plato's spirit is the part that feels anger, shame and the love of honor and, in a healthy soul, sides with reason. Some modern writers loosely call it will.

Why does Thinking have two dimensions?

Because thinking works in two modes: seeing wholes and analyzing parts. Behavioral science draws the same line between intuitive and deliberate thinking, and Jung's analytical psychology between intuition and thinking. It gives Thinking two routes to a high score, so the result page shows your faculty scores and your four dimension scores side by side.

All 46 questions

Next step

See your own profile

40 questions, about 15 minutes. No account. Your answers stay in your browser.